Instagram Posts May Have Escalated Fatal Standoff, Police Say
The episode highlights Facebook’s increasingly complicated role in documenting violence, and in some cases, its active place in the middle of it. Before the shots were fired, the Instagram posts caught the police’s attention. Read More
Yeah… I’ma tell you like Will Evans told me: if somebody messages something reckless / ignorant / snarky at you, “Mmm–How many followers they got? Only 127 people care what this cat got to say? Not Even worth the time.” That’s been my litmus test for twitter fingers for the longest. Jordan breaks that shit down into math, “I don’t respond to people with 40,000 tweets and 400 followers.”
+Commentary:This is an interesting and very funny look at the psychology behind Twitter, with some really great tips & hints.
+Commentary: Great read from Harvard Business Review, while ostensibly for community managers, it can be applied very broadly to all your social media practices as a micro-business or in any micromarkteting efforts. Read More
Facebook relies on editors’ judgment for trending news feed, documents show
But the documents show that the company relies heavily on the intervention of a small editorial team to determine what makes its “trending module” headlines – the list of news topics that shows up on the side of the browser window on Facebook’s desktop version. The company backed away from a pure-algorithm approach in 2014 after criticism that it had not included enough coverage of unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, in users’ feeds. Read More
But the most appealing factor of live streaming – raw content at the touch of a button – is also its biggest threat: The inability of companies to monitor live content has spawned an entirely new set of serious safety and privacy issues for users. The freedom to live-stream just about anything, anywhere in the world, has prompted a new and uncomfortable predicament for social media companies: What should they do if – or when – a crime is being live-streamed on their platform?
How should digital news organisations respond to this? Some say it is simple – “Don’t read the comments” or, better still, switch them off altogether. And many have done just that, disabling their comment threads for good because they became too taxing to bother with.
But in so many cases journalism is enriched by responses from its readers. So why disable all comments when only a small minority is a problem?
At the Guardian, we felt it was high time to examine the problem rather than turn away.
+NOTE:some really great interactive visualizations go along with the data accompanying this article at the link below:
Another Day, Another bad tweet. Clowning Begins in 3, 2, 1…
(Click any picture above to see close-up or easily scroll through )
Today’s offender: Cosmopolitan Magazine
Offense:#CosmoHeadlines in 2011, 2013, 2014 & now again it seems they can’t help tweeting the wrong thing, composing a stupid headline, or making a comparison that will get the ire of everyone. Can’t find it, but as recently as last week they had another offensive tweet. Perhaps slightly longer. This is really a signal that whatever intern they have managing their globally recognized brand is making waves once more. Deleting & moving on is one way to deal with it, but remember screencaps are forever. Read More
Offense? Being rather culturally insensitive & going out of their way to craft a picture of trash bags with gold chain & a sunglasses to emulate Bruno Mars & Dance Crew during their Super Bowl 50. Who wouldn’t be flattered? Or maybe they were hoping to display some edgy millennial humor? Either way, a clear #Fail.
+Commentary: This is a highly informative infographic with much wisdom highlighted, it is like an Emily Post Social [Media] Etiquette Guide for commenting that does not go far enough to address all situations. It is a basic how-to, and a starting point. The follow up on the blog page (click the image above to read) as it gives you three solid reasons why negative comments can be good for your business.